Four myths about cladistics

Authors

  • Juan J. Morrone Museo de zoología, Departamento de Biología evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Jorge Llorente Bousquets Museo de zoología, Departamento de Biología evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/dugesiana.v9i1.7225

Keywords:

cladistics, myths

Abstract

The following four myths related to modern cladistics are discussed and shown to be false: (1) the taxon being analyzed must be monophyletic; (2) characters must be polarized; (3) Darwinism is incompatible with cladistics; and (4) classification strictly reflects phylogenetic relationships.

References

Ax, P. 1987. The phylogenetic system, the systematización of organisms on the basic of thee their phylogenesis Jhon Wiley and sons, New York

Cantino, P. D., H. N. Btyant, K. de Queiroz, M. J. Donoghue, T. Eriksson, D. M. Hillis and M.S. Y. Lee. 1999. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Systematic Biology, 48:790-807

Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft. 1980. Phylogenetic patrerns and evolutionary process Columbia University press, New York.

De Queiroz, K. and J. Gautheir. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9:27-31

Forey P. L., C. J. Humphries, I. J. Kitching, R. W. Scotland, D. J. Sicbert and D. M. Williams (eds). 1992. cladistics a practical course in systematics, Clarendon press, Oxford Science Publications, the systematic associations no.10, Oxford

Ghiselin, M. T. 1985. Maur versus Darwin on paraphyletic taxa, Systematic Zoology, 34: 460-462

Gologoff, P. A. 1998. principios basicos de cladistica. sociedad Argentina de Botánica, buenos Aires

Greuter, W., D. L. Hawksworth, J. McNeill, M. A. Mayo, A. Minelli, P. H. A. Sneath, B. J. Tindall, P. Trehane and P. Tubbs, 1998. Draft Biocode (1997). The prospective international rules for the Scientific names of organisms, Taxon, 47:127-150.

Published

2021-09-17